Devil.ai

METAPHYSICS
Not just 4-Letter acronyms Not just 4-Letter acronyms

Not just 4-Letter acronyms

15 November 2 months ago

The 4 letter acronyms used to represent a person's personality (ESFJ INTP ESTJ etc) miss fundamental understanding of how this framework truly works. How does MBTI work? How does MBTI work? 7 December A short rundown over how MBTI functions, classes, personalities work. header image Introversion (I) and Extraversion (E) imply an infinite description of a person's orientation. No person is an infinite extravert or an infinite introvert. Being told an incorrect infinite of an orientation that is a spectrum counters the framework infinitely. The same goes for the other acronym letters. MBTI personality types are fundamentally their function stack. The function stack is your priority of thought put into a hierarchy. (Thoughts of the future, thoughts of the past, etc). Putting thoughts you think into a hierarchy is a fundamental representation of personality at its core. There are two directions you can take for understanding a personality: - Conscious personality typing. - Subconscious personality typing. Conscious personality tests such as The Big 5 and The Nine Enneagrams, tell you what is conscious. It tells you what you almost certainly already are going to know about yourself or another person. It is conscious understanding at a conscious level. Conscious personality typing touches very little of what is subconscious about a person. It tells you nothing of how a person fundamentally thinks. MBTI personality tests are truly subconscious personality tests. Your priority of thought is a subconscious understanding of who you are. Priority of thought is a fundamental representation of who you are underneath. It is a fundamental science. Fundamental science is infinitely countered when the science itself uses acronyms like I or E (N or S, F or T, P or J) to represent infinites of orientation. MBTI is easily dismissed when a person types themselves from the 4 letter acronym alone. MBTI's naming schema is flawed. Your thought hierarchy is everything. Fundamental representation of personality types. Personality names must be a conscious description of a personality. However MBTI 4-letter acronyms are taken too far conscious. Phrases like "The Innovator" or "The Visionary" go the other direction and are too far subconsciously understood - every person will have a unique view of what they truly mean. A conscious descriptive name must represent the personality to its conscious infinite. - We must avoid using names that have varied subconscious understanding. - We must avoid using acronyms that label infinites of orientation unless it is actually infinite. - We must avoid using scales to represent a personality as scales are not fundamental representations knowing they may change. - We must avoid using a naming convention that is hard to know what types match with. - We must avoid using a naming convention that is hard to work out other egos in the same personality. - We must avoid using a naming convention that requires good memory. - We must ensure subconscious personality typing stays true to how it truly works. (Hierarchy of thought) - We must ensure matching personality types are simple to work out. - We must ensure the naming convention describes the personality to its conscious infinite. - We must ensure we always use conscious descriptions of only fundamental infinites. - We must ensure we do not counter the fundamental framework with unfundamental wording. Hierarchy of thought is where we start as it is the first fundamental representation of personality. What is unique about every personality? Using the first 4 functions as an acronym (INFJ changed to NFTS to match the function hierarchy of Ni, Fe, Ti, Se) is hard to remember, difficult to understand, and doesn't have a easy to know correlation to other personalities with the same naming convention. With everything in mind: When I use my Ni hero I am a quiet and shy person engaged in my mind and I may look a bit consciously adrift. When I use my Ti child my persona changes to a more conversational thinker/speaker and I'm a little more extraverted and consciously engaged in my surroundings. Changing from one class to another is treated as the same ego personality even though they act in very different ways. These are fundamentally different personalities. My Ni hero is not trapped into thinking only Ni thoughts. My Ni hero is very capable of thinking thoughts outside of Ni. I'm even able to Si without using my subconscious Si demon. The thoughts come from the same feeling of the same ego function. The thoughts are fully engaged with my Ni feelings. They do not come from other functions in the same conscious ego. Knowing my Ni hero is a unique personality when I use it and that it can subconsciously think other types of thoughts would be a fundamental subconscious personality in my mind. Subconscious personalities is the next fundamental level. INFJ has Fe parent. If we treat Fe parent like it is its own ego/personality then we can fundamentally assume that Fe parent is its own Fe hero. There are only two personalities with Fe as its hero: But how do we determine which personality my Fe parent might be? The differences between the two Isabel Briggs Myers has already done for us long ago: N (Intuition) vs S (Sensing) ENFJ vs ESFJ Now we have to make a decision on how we determine fundamentally which personality my Fe parent is. (N vs S is only for solving Fe's personality) What's the consistent fundamental difference across all four categories originally imagined by Isabel Briggs Myers?: Extraversion (E) vs Introversion (I) Sensing (S) vs Intuition (N) Thinking (T) vs Feeling (F) Perceiving (P) vs Judging (J) ... Answer: Orientation between conscious and subconscious. This means that: ESFJ is the conscious personality. ENFJ is the subconscious personality. (Relative to ExFJ) Solving the question Fe can only exist in either the conscious or subconscious division of a personality type. With my latest updates to the framework I have also added conscious and subconscious labels. This means that Fe in the conscious division is Fe conscious (Fec) and Fe in the subconscious division is Fe subconscious (Fes) and they think and feel in very different ways. There are only two personalities with Fe hero - one is conscious (ESFJ), one is subconscious (ENFJ). Fe-conscious can only match up with ESFJ and Fe-subconscious can only match up with ENFJ. There are no other conflicting or overlapping personalities. The same logic can be applied to all my other functions as well in the conscious division: Now we can apply the same logic to all functions and personalities. Notice the perfect 1 to 1 match with all function types and personality types? There is zero overlap with other personalities. There is zero conflicts with any functions or any hero classes. Nis instead of INFJ describes the INFJ's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection. Fes instead of ENFJ describes the ENFJ's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection. Tis instead of INTP describes the INTP's personality to its conscious infinite to perfection. All the 3-letter acronyms are fundamental descriptions. All the 3-letter acronyms describe the personality to it's fundamental infinite. Matching personality types then become easy to recognise: From INTJ & ENTP to Nic / Nec From ISTJ & ESTP to Sic / Sec From ENTJ & INTP to Tes / Tis Working out a person's division heros becomes simple to calculate: (S and N are opposites) (F and T is the other opposite) Most of the public understand personalities as the old 4 letters and what they each stand for. MBTI naming system is outdated. True understanding is the function stack. True understanding at its infinite fundamental is knowing the hero (Conscious / subconscious). The original 4-letter acronym system lacks consistent parallels between all personalities. The original 4-letter acronym system is associated with gross misunderstandings over how this framework works. The original 4-letter acronym system counters the fundamental framework infinitely with unfundamental infinite descriptions. New acronyms (Nis, Sic, Tes, etc) shows you have function stack understanding. New acronyms separates yourself from armchair psychologists. New acronyms counters arrogant assumptions and judgements over how this framework works. New acronyms stops a fundamental science from being seen as a metascience. "A conscious descriptive name must represent the personality to its conscious infinite."

Chum bucketChum bucket

Psychology has been outdated for a long time.


Function personalities (Devil types): Nic  (Ni conscious) = INTJ Nis  (Ni subconscious) = INFJ Nec  (Ne conscious) = ENTP Nes  (Ne subconscious) = ENFP Fic  (Fi conscious) = ISFP Fis  (Fi subconscious) = INFP Fec  (Fe conscious) = ESFJ Fes  (Fe subconscious) = ENFJ Tic  (Ti conscious) = ISTP Tis  (Ti subconscious) = INTP Tec  (Te conscious) = ESTJ Tes  (Te subconscious) = ENTJ Sic  (Si conscious) = ISTJ Sis  (Si subconscious) = ESFJ Sec  (Se conscious) = ESTP Ses  (Se subconscious) = ESFP This new level of specificity over conscious and subconscious functions opened up a whole new level of understanding personality types.

Spongebob BurgerSpongebob burger

Going subconscious. Now we have a personality for each class/function in every personality type. Putting this together and expanding, the INFJ's Ni Hero would be an INTJ (Using my assumed logic): INFJ Ni Hero (INTJ) = Ni Te Fi Se Ne Ti Fe Si Naturally now I can expand each function downwards now that I can determine a personality for each class/function relative to the personality type: wow The Si function in column 2 and 7 look swapped with the Ni function. Also the Se function in column 2 and 7 break the diagonal Ne. Also see the null personalities [?] in the horizontal columns (The conscious functions are correct but the subconscious functions don't match the same personality so it breaks what personality it could have been) My logic to determine which personality to pick for each function was based off an assumption however it brought me to this moment. It seems like the pattern is broken which implies my logic was wrong. This shows that there is another method for determining which personality to pick. Now I can dig into this new view of the data and personality types and search for a pattern to follow from. To begin fixing I'd have to Change ESTJ to an ENTJ and ENFJ to an ESFJ to swap the Ni and Si around: This is already looking much better however the 4 null rows are all personality types that dont exist. This is the data I was manipulating in order to fix and adjust the chart: I'm using the same data for all classes in the same personality. I was able to make the Ni Hero align perfectly but then all the other classes had misalignment issues:

Rubix CubeRubix Cube

There must be an alignment that fits together. We can assume that the INFJ (Nis) and ESTP (Sec) have the same alignment as they share the same functions across their conscious and subconscious. The same goes with all the other personality types and their primary alter ego. I can simplify my data now into the functions and their type. I just have to work out what each function would be (c or s). Which would link to a personality type.

Panther

I solved everything: Final data and completed model below + a whole new science: (Turns out the INFJ Ni Hero is the INFJ (Nis) I had originally assumed. And it's circular.) This data can be reduced further creating two new fundamental personality groups: And now it can be reduced even further: And now we have a fundamental separation between personality types based off their function type. Let's use the labels if applicable: Ns, Fs, Tc, Sc, Nc, Fc, Ts, Ss. This natural separation is another conscious/subconscious divide. That data alone allowed me to fundamentally solve class personality types to their circular infinite and I've built a representation of it here:

Nis
Conscious  Ego
Primary Ego INFJ
Purposeful

INFJ Conscious ego subconscious good

Conscious thoughts
Conscious self control

Nis N Heroes
Nis INFJ
INFJ Hero
Nis
Fes F ENFJ Parent
Fes
Tic T ISTP Child
Tic
Sec S ESTP Inferior
Sec
Nes N ENFP Nemesis
Nes
Fis F INFP Critic
Fis
Tec T ESTJ Trickster
Tec
Sic S ISTJ Demon
Sic
Heroes
Nis INFJ
Fes N Parents
Fes ENFJ
Nis F
Sec T
Tic S
Fis N
Nes F
Sic T
Tec S Parents
Fes ENFJ
Tic N Children
Tic ISTP
Sec F
Nis T
Fes S
Tec N
Sic F
Nes T
Fis S Children
Tic ISTP
Sec N Inferiors
Sec ESTP
Tic F
Fes T
Nis S
Sic N
Tec F
Fis T
Nes S Inferiors
Sec ESTP
Nes N Nemeses
Nes ENFP
Fis F
Tec T
Sic S
Nis N
Fes F
Tic T
Sec S Nemeses
Nes ENFP
Fis N Critics
Fis INFP
Nes F
Sic T
Tec S
Fes N
Nis F
Sec T
Tic S Critics
Fis INFP
Tec N Tricksters
Tec ESTJ
Sic F
Nes T
Fis S
Tic N
Sec F
Nis T
Fes S Tricksters
Tec ESTJ
Sic N Demons
Sic ISTJ
Tec F
Fis T
Nes S
Sec N
Tic F
Fes T
Nis S Demons
Sic ISTJ

The model above is a circular representation of the INFJ with brand new class personalities and new function personalities. You can extend this model further by extending into the Y axis to create a 3d rubix cube.

Rubix CubeRubix Cube

It's circular b/c every inner function has the same hierarchy and set of functions in the same order. You can dive infinitely into every function and you'll always have this same model as the representation. It's the Hero function recurring infinitely. It doesn't matter what class you use it is always within a Nis Hero (For the INFJ). Every class personality links back to the same 8 personalities. This new model gives subconscious feelings in your mind conscious visual representation. It's a fundamental visual representation of how you think. It's a fundamental visual representation of subconscious feelings. With the reverse switch disabled, the functions going in the opposite diagonal (↗ ↙) (Sic Demon and Sec Inferior) to the hero function (↘ ↖) (Nis Hero) are the first fundamental visual representations (And proof) of opposing functions. Fes Parent also travels in the same diagonal as the hero (Supporting). Tic Child also travels in the same diagonal as the hero (Supporting). Fis Critic travels in the opposite diagonal as the hero (Opposing). Tec Trickster travels in the opposite diagonal as the hero (Opposing). Nes Nemesis travels in the same diagonal as the hero but is a right brain function. (Evil thoughts that satisfy the hero) (Supporting). We have now unlocked a representation of many heroes, parents, children, etc within a personality type and a hierarchy that spans infinitely. In the original standard order originally developed by John Beebe (1: Hero, 2: Parent, 3: Child, 4: Inferior, 5: Nemesis, 6: Critic, 7: Trickster, 8: Demon) the functions alignment (extraverted / introverted) pattern doesn't link together when merging the function order however with a reversed subconscious, introverted / extraverted lines up beautifully: Inferior -> Demon is a natural switch into the subconscious personality. Every domino in the reversed chart represents a switch into subconscious personality types. We've also unlocked new fundamental descriptions for roles in personality types:

The INFJ is the INFJ's Ni Hero.

The ENFJ is the INFJ's Fe Parent.

The ISTP is the INFJ's Ti Child.

The ESTP is the INFJ's Se Inferior.



The ENFP is the INFJ's Ne Nemesis.

The INFP is the INFJ's Fi Critic.

The ESTJ is the INFJ's Te Trickster.

The ISTJ is the INFJ's Si Demon.

Along with new class descriptions for all the new function personalities: We also now know the subconscious personality of every thought of each personality type.

The ENFP is the subconscious of the INFJ Ni Hero.

The INFP is the subconscious of the INFJ Fe Parent.

The ESTJ is the subconscious of the INFJ Ti Child.

The ISTJ is the subconscious of the INFJ Se Inferior.

The INFJ is the subconscious of the INFJ Ne Nemesis.

The ENFJ is the subconscious of the INFJ Fi Critic.

The ISTP is the subconscious of the INFJ Te Trickster.

The ESTP is the subconscious of the INFJ Si Demon.

Logic is fundamentally conscious understanding while feelings are fundamentally subconscious understanding. The INFJ's Nis Hero is significantly different to the INTJ Nic Hero and the differences can now be described in one word: Every function in every personality is unique and can now be defined with a "c" or "s". Whatever personality group you are in below, you will share the same personalities in the same group in your entire conscious personality. I have labeled these new personalities in every personality type as "Alter egos". These personalities have never been found before and can be used to perfectly describe the classes of each personality type. S group (Ns Fs Tc Sc alter egos): INFJ ENFJ ISTP ESTP ISTJ ESTJ INFP ENFP C group (Nc Fc Ts Ss alter egos): INTJ ENTJ ISFP ESFP ENTP INTP ESFJ ISFJ These are two fundamental separations of personality types. It's a fundamental divide. It's a fundamental left / right brain across the planet.

WorldWorld

A quick history before everything: In 1921 Carl Jung proposed that individuals had two core traits to their personalities: - Two attributes: Extraversion or Introversion. - Four functions: Sensing S and Intuition I, Thinking T and Feeling F. Carl described personalities with phrases like "introverted intuition" or "extraverted feeling" introducing the functions we have today (Ni, Fe, etc). Later in the 1940s, Katherine Cook Briggs & Isabel Briggs Myers put the functions into a hierarchy and labelled the fundamental model MBTI. Then in the 1980s John Beebe expanded MBTI by introducing archetypal roles to the hierarchy (Hero, Parent, Child etc). Leaving us with the model we have today: 2024: Everything I've written in this post regarding new class/function personalities (Nis) and the Rubix model has expanded MBTI from a single personality type to 8 fundamental personality types relative to every class in every personality. Along with new fundamental words to describe each function, FUTURE, LOGIC, OPINION, etc (For quick conscious understanding and easy public understanding) and identifying all the alter egos that exist in every mind. When you're with your friends you may act in a certain way. When you're with your family you may act in another way. When you're alone you may act in yet another way. These differences in how you express yourself are fundamentally different personalities. These different personalities come fundamentally from different groups of feelings in your mind. These different personalities have different needs, desires and unique ways of thinking and feeling. These are fundamentally different people in your mind: The class function personalities I've uncovered above describe all the alter egos that exist in your mind that you use consciously and subconsciously all day long. The discovery of a millennia Uncovering the next everything Debating whether or not the subconscious mind exists within the brain or external from the brain is a pitiful debate when you have zero fundamental subconscious evidence for either. Monitoring brain activity in conscious space is meaningless if the activity starts externally. Brain activity will always end up in conscious space if we use feeling to make conscious speech in physical space.

Egyptian Magic

Philosophy is pointless if you're trying to introduce a new conscious understanding. Fundamental logic is everything. N F T S are fundamental preferences of the mind uncovered by Carl Jung. Fundamental categories of thought are an understanding that came from the preferences of the mind. Preferences of the mind is what the mind thinks. Putting those categories into a hierarchy introduced a new fundamental understanding of how the mind thinks. Why the mind thinks Gateway to everything

WorldWorld

A fundamentally subconscious happening will forever continue being subconscious. A fundamentally subconscious happening cannot be made conscious fundamentally. A fundamental subconscious can only be consciously proven with fundamental logic or experience. Conscious fundamental logic are infinites of understanding that can never be fundamentally countered. Logic thought up from a foundation of unfundamental assumptions is not fundamental logic. The Ontological Argument is a perfect example of unfundamental logic misunderstood as fundamental logic: 3D space is fundamentally less than infinite. The mind extends to infinites and beyond. 0 is a subconscious number Conscious understandings are fundamentally less than infinite: Anything that can be represented consciously can never be a honest representation of an infinite. Infinites are fundamentally beyond conscious space and honest conscious representation. Sculpture: Diminish and Ascend 1 ÷ 0's answer is treated as undefined in mathematics. Reason: Division is understood with the unfundamental conscious assumption: "How many times can we repeatedly add 0 to itself to reach 1?". 0 is an infinite understanding Division is a calculation that can fundamentally be used with infinites. Turning an infinite calculation into conscious logic breaks down calculation of infinites: Undefined as a result of 1 ÷ 0 is fundamentally a failure in the system used to calculate. 0 as a result of 1 x 0 is fundamentally a failure in the system used to calculate. 1 or undefined as a result of 00 is fundamentally a failure in the system used to calculate. Undefined as a result of is fundamentally a failure in the system used to calculate.

WorldWorld

The mind isn't a subconscious calculator? Language is logical feeling.   Something divided by nothing can only be the same something.   Something multiplied by nothing can only be the same something.   Nothing to the power of nothing can only be nothing.   Infinity minus the same infinity can only be zero. This is fundamental logic. Fundamental logic fundamentally transcends conscious mathematical principles.

Paddington Bear waterPaddington Bear water

Division is subconscious Solving 1/0 consciously Something as subconscious as division requires you to feel for how division works and translate that feeling into conscious logic. Something as simple as 3 divided by 0 equals 3 can be felt with very conscious feeling. Translating feeling into conscious thought will always trump conscious rules of calculation. Translating a feeling Here's 10 divided by 3 as a feeling translated into conscious logic: Break the number into 3 but only focus on the first part's separation point as the answer. Translated again: Focus on 1/3rd of the number and focus on the point of separation. Translated again: Put 2 lines through the number with even spacing and focus on the first separation point. This is subconscious logic translated into conscious logic. It's a feeling that has conscious meaning. The last translation contains the most systematic logic. Here's the number line I was imagining with the two lines added: To get an answer we need to make a conscious measurement on the number line which is infinitely dependent on the true width of the line we're measuring. With the number line at 10 pixels wide we get a measurement of 3.3 pixels. If I increase the number line to 10,000 pixels width we get a measurement of 3,333.2 pixels. To get the number of lines we need to cut the number line into we take 1 from the divisor (From 3 to 2). New conscious mathematics is everything. If the divisor was 0 and we removed 1 we'd get -1. If the divisor was 1 and we removed 1 we'd get 0. 0 and -1 are not conscious numbers. They do not exist consciously so the number line is left untouched and we get the same number back. We're getting correct answers however obviously the accuracy depends on the true width of the line. If the line was infinitely long we'd get an infinitely accurate answer which is exactly what you'd want because this is conscious mathematics - not subconscious. Measurement is conscious Measuring a dividing point makes recurring values consciously impossible. Recurring values are fundamentally not a division. Recurring values are fundamentally a breakdown of conscious space. These fundamental rules are very important for the next mbti revelation. Quick multiplication fix Current multiplication rule: 3×4 means you add 3 four times: 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12 3+3+3+3=12. This does not work for 0 number. Conscious multiplication is fixed with a simple rule change: 1. Start with the first number. 2. Add the number to itself (multiplyer - 1) times. Eg 10 x 3: 1. Start with 10. 2. Multiplier is 3, so multiplyer - 1 = 2. 3. Add 10 to itself 2 more times. 10 + 10 + 10 = 30. 10 x 1 will still have the correct answer of 10 10 x 0 the multiplyer becomes -1 which isn't a conscious number so the number is left unchanged and the answer is 10. This is a conscious working system that is made for conscious mathematical calculations perfectly mimicking subconscious infinite calculations in conscious space with conscious rules. What's the point? What is the subconscious if we have no way to seperate what is conscious and what is subconscious. Mathematics is miles behind fundamental universal logical understandings. New conscious mathematics is an honest framework that accurately reflects infinite mathematics however consciously we require a balance of "How far do we want to calculate" b/c infinites do not exist consciously. This is not a call for a replacement for division or multiplication. Current division and multiplication is however flawed requiring incorrect edge-case rulesets for numbers such as 0. New division is fundamentally conscious-only mathematics accurately reflecting how subconscious mathematics works. Arrogant mathematicians will no doubt refute 1 / 0 = 1 with broken conscious logical reasoning. New conscious infinite mathematics is for everything. Numbers are fundamentally an unlimited. Unlimited is fundamentally subconscious. Current mathematical principles fundamentally conflict with the foundational number system they're designed for.

Planet of the ApesPlanet of the Apes

Infinites are not misunderstandings Infinites always end at a fundamental. Unlimiteds have no end. Assuming a subconscious infinite is a breakdown of physics is a fundamental breakdown of logic. Black hole infinite maths countered with string theory and quantum gravity is wasted time. Black holes are a fundamental circular representation of what a conscious infinite would become: Fundamental subconscious.

Self GodSelf God

MBTI is a science of the subconscious Hierarchy of thought is fundamentally a conscious understanding but what it can only represent fundamentally are the feelings beneath. There is a great subconscious influence over how MBTI functions fit together and public psychology is none the wiser: MBTI functions fit together in a pattern of Introverted -> Extraverted -> Introverted -> Extraverted and nobody understands why other than "balance". MBTI functions pair up F and T (Hero and inferior or parent and child) and N and S (Hero and inferior or parent and child) and nobody understands why other than "balance". MBTI functions from the same letter (N F T S) always have an introverted and extraverted in seperate divisons and nobody understands why other than a "balance". Patterns imply a system. Patterns imply a subconscious influence. Pattterns imply fundamental order. What we're seeing is a fundamental duality persisting across all areas of cognitive function. This duality is exactly the same as a conscious/subconscious divide or a left/right brain. There's a fundamental duality correlating everywhere we look. Everything is interconnected

Left right brainLeft right brain

The correct representation of the 8 cognitive functions are with the subconscious in the reverse order allowing all functions to align uniformly b/c the subconscious is a fundamental opposite. Now let's compare this version with the new model expanding every new class personality horizontally. We're looking at a circular representation of how we fundamentally think. A perfect circular modelling framework of the underlaying network of thoughts and feelings. Let's match the class personalities together into their pairs to see what we get (2 heros together: Hero and Inferior, 2 parents together: Parent and Critic, 2 children together: Child and Trickster, 2 inferiors together: Inferior and Demon): What are we really looking at We've gone from 1 pair of N (Ni and Ne) in the original model to 8 pairs of Ni and Ne however we can merge all the left and right brains together to see this model in its most fundamental form like a fraction by folding the subconscious' over the conscious. Gif: We can still reduce this further by folding the subconscious into the conscious again. Here's the final representation of the INFJ reduced as far as we can go in its most fundamental form: And here are all the other personality types in their most fundamental forms:

This is as far as we can reduce. We cannot go diagonally bc the diagonal does not fold. We cannot reverse any other 'shadow' to make another pattern fold together.

Treasure chestTreasure chest

Everything Still writing post - 24th Dec 16:04pm


All Posts
Back to all posts